Multiple Slope Instabilities

media chevron

Introduction

For an undisclosed location and commodity, an open pit slope was monitored for slope stability purposes and to identify areas of interest for assessment, to classify the rate of movement accumulation and to propose site calibrated alarm thresholds. An image of the pit slope and the live view of the displacement and average velocity is shown in Figure 1. The distance to the identified areas of interest range between 600 m and 2 260 m, the scan area is approximately 970 m by 4 130 m.

Figure 1: The pit slope is shown with the live view displacement and average velocity with an observational scale* of 80 mm is shown on the right for a period of 24 hours
Figure 1: The pit slope is shown with the live view displacement and average velocity with an observational scale* of 80 mm is shown on the right for a period of 24 hours

*An observational scale is one that is outside of the alarm threshold application and shows the displacement and average velocity at increments defined by the user to show as much detail as is required.

Identification of the Areas of Interest

Three principal areas of interest were identified (Figure 2), for which detailed polygons were drawn (Area 1, Area 2 and Area 3), with defined areas covering the concentrated movement signature (Defined Area 1 to Defined Area 5). A single point/pixel was also allocated at the centre of the concentration of movement to track the highest level of movement being measured by MSR Halo (Points 1 to Point 7). Two mask areas were applied (MA1 and MA2) for data that was not relevant to the study.

Figure 2: The identified areas of interest, defined area locations and points and the two applied mask areas
Figure 2: The identified areas of interest, defined area locations and points and the two applied mask areas

Observations of the identified areas of interest are for a 24 hour review period of the collected data:

Note that the movement convention is positive, that is, above the zero line on the trend plot which indicates movement towards the radar.

Figure 3: The area and point application on the synthetic map (observational displacement scale of 80 mm) with the respective displacement and average velocity trend plots for Area 1
Figure 3: The area and point application on the synthetic map (observational displacement scale of 80 mm) with the respective displacement and average velocity trend plots for Area 1
Figure 4: The area and point application on the synthetic map (observational displacement scale of 80 mm) with the respective displacement and average velocity trend plots for Area 2
Figure 4: The area and point application on the synthetic map (observational displacement scale of 80 mm) with the respective displacement and average velocity trend plots for Area 2
Figure 5: The area and point application on the synthetic map (observational displacement scale of 80 mm) with the respective displacement and average velocity trend plots for Area 3
Figure 5: The area and point application on the synthetic map (observational displacement scale of 80 mm) with the respective displacement and average velocity trend plots for Area 3

Alarm Threshold Application and Trend Plot Observations

Alarm threshold values were selected based on the observed accumulation rate of displacement for the Areas 1, 2 and 3 which was also applicable to the Defined Areas (1 to 5) and the Points (1 to 7). The alarm thresholds were applied for both trend plot alarm exceedance and an area threshold (10 m x 10 m = 100 m) criterion (Figure 6). Please note that the alarm thresholds are set for a 24 hour period for the displacement. The alarm exceedance instructions are an example and may be configured as per the user’s requirements and operational processes and procedures.

Figure 6: The alarm threshold application, alert distribution group and instructions
Figure 6: The alarm threshold application, alert distribution group and instructions

Table 1 details the movement type, values and alert level ratings based on the alarm threshold application in Figure 6 for 24 hour period for Areas 1, 2 and 3.

Table 1: Trend plot values and observations for Areas 1, 2 and 3
Table 1: Trend plot values and observations for Areas 1, 2 and 3

Based on the assessment of the synthetic map, trend plots, and the alarm exceedance warnings, an Alert Level Rating Synthetic Map was generated for this specific dataset and period of observational time (Figure 7). A time period of 24 hours is applied to the displacement with a one hour time window utilised for the average velocity.

Note that Level 4 is illustrated on the synthetic map for the average velocity specifically as it shows the latest synthetic map data. This higher value may be representative of an acceleration phase for Area 3 (the Figure 4 graphs corroborate this).

Figure 7: The live view displacement (above) and average velocity (below) synthetic maps which correspond to the alert triggers provided in Figure 6
Figure 7: The live view displacement (above) and average velocity (below) synthetic maps which correspond to the alert triggers provided in Figure 6

Conclusion

In summary:

Share Case Study

Related Papers / Case Studies